What's Luck Got to do with the Luck Pincer?
نویسندگان
چکیده
Luck skepticism is the view that no one ever morally responsible for anything because of nature and ubiquity luck. One acclaimed argument in favor this Neil Levy's luck pincer. The pincer holds all significant acts or events involve either present luck, constitutive both each negate moral responsibility. Therefore, any action event. I argue unsound as its premises are false. First, not Some non-lucky. Second, do always – independent ontological concerns threatening to free will often thought.
منابع مشابه
What's Luck Got to Do with It: Single Cells, Multiple Fates, and Biological Nondeterminism.
The field of single-cell biology has morphed from a philosophical digression at its inception, to a playground for quantitative biologists, to a major area of biomedical research. The last several years have witnessed an explosion of new technologies, allowing us to apply even more of the modern molecular biology toolkit to single cells. Conceptual progress, however, has been comparatively slow...
متن کاملMoral Luck
The good will is not good because of what it effects or accomplishes or because of its adequacy to achieve some proposed end; it is good only because of its willing, i.e., it is good of itself And, regarded for itself, it is to be esteemed incomparably higher than anything which could be brought about by it in favor of any inclination or even of the sum total of all inclinations. Even if it sho...
متن کاملFarewell and Good Luck
S 93 – SOMMAIRES 95 – ZUSAMMENFASSUNGEN 97 – RESÚMENES 99 – 101 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93 Notes for Contributors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103 Editor (responsible): Ross ...
متن کاملExpecting Bad Luck
This paper draws on Card’s discussions of moral luck to consider the complicated moral life of people—described as pessimists—who accept the heavy knowledge of the predictability of the bad moral luck of oppression. The potential threat to ethics posed by this knowledge can be overcome by the pessimist whose resistance to oppression, even in the absence of hope, expresses a sense of still havin...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Pacific Philosophical Quarterly
سال: 2021
ISSN: ['0279-0750', '1468-0114']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/papq.12378